Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 08:40
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
5 Supplements to Avoid If You Have Insulin Resistance, According to Dietitians - EatingWell
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
When a narcissist mad at their new supply, do they take it out on the old supply?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Russia can stop this any time.
What does it mean when someone says "I'm feeling frisky"?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What’s next?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Thank you.